Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lena Papadakis vs Fanny Ostlund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papadakis vs Ostlund analysis and find out who is favored!
Lena Papadakis vs Fanny Ostlund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Papadakis 1 - 0 Ostlund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papadakis has won 50.08% of points on his second serve, while Ostlund has won 50.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papadakis, in recent form, has won 57.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ostlund has won 55.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.44% and 44.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papadakis has saved 54.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ostlund has saved 55.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papadakis has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 24/ 21), with Ostlund winning 59.32% (W/L 35/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papadakis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 24/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Ostlund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 31/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 84/ 69).
- Player level: In the last year, Papadakis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 22/ 16), where as Ostlund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.32% of matches (W/L 35/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Papadakis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Papadakis winning 2 and Ostlund winning 0. The last match between Papadakis and Ostlund was at the W25 Nairobi, 22-12-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Lena Papadakis getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Papadakis and Ostlund have played a deciding set 0 times, with Papadakis winning 0 times and Ostlund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Papadakis winning 1, and Ostlund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papadakis has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.51 while Ostlund has played against players with an average rank of 277.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papadakis has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ostlund has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papadakis has converted 49.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ostlund has converted 51.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
513
Rank
250
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
362
Rank
360
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
55% (217-176)
Career Total W/L
56% (266-209)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
63% (10-6)
$9,509
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lena Papadakis | Fanny Ostlund |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 86% (55/64) | 79% (64/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (39/55) | 59% (38/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (6/9) | 59% (10/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (33/81) | 30% (19/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Lena Papadakis
Player
Fanny Ostlund
86%
(
55 of
64)
1st Serve %
79%
(
64 of
81)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lena Papadakis | Fanny Ostlund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 63% (10/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (36/21) | 62% (24/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (283/220) | 55% (208/170) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 78% (7/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:10 | 2:2:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 244.63 | 226.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1116/1660) | 70% (857/1217) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (688/1116) | 58% (493/857) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (268/544) | 50% (181/360) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (117/236) | 55% (92/166) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (828/1698) | 49% (585/1183) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (15/9) | 63% (10/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 60% (9/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Lena Papadakis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Lena Papadakis
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Sarah-Rebecca Sekulic
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Lena Papadakis
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 7-6(5) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Giada Ciampa
36%
(
9 of
25)
1st Serve %
57%
(
17 of
30)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
4%
(
1 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
7
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Lena Papadakis
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Aneta Kladivova
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Zoe Kaegi
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Lena Papadakis
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Sofia Milatova
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Ana Petkovic
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fanny Ostlund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Fanny Ostlund
56%
(
64 of
115)
1st Serve %
73%
(
102 of
139)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
66 of
139)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Olga Helmi
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
109)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
11
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
55 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
61 of
109)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Fanny Ostlund
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Fanny Ostlund
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
77%
(
79 of
102)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Farah Heddar
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Fanny Ostlund
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
41 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Fanny Ostlund
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Michika Ozeki
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Fanny Ostlund
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Papadakis Vs Ostlund Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
